Inside Veritas -
Article 1
- Former Governor/Ambassador to speak at January 16th meeting
Article 2
- Business News & Issues
Article 3 - State’s #1 in Home Ownership
Article 4 - Taxation and Finance - Unclaimed Property
Issues
Article 5 - How times change in 12 years
Association News Update
Economic Update - 1 negative quarter
a recession makes?
BS: Still about Nothing in
particular
Would you like to see a previous Veritas Issues? Click Here
Former Governor/Ambassador to speak at January 16th meeting 
   To kick off its ‘02 series of meetings, the builders association
has turned to former Governor of Michigan, and Ambassador to Canada, James
J. Blanchard. At a time when the issues surrounding trade with our northern
neighbor are taking front stage at, both, the local level in regards to future
economic development plans, and the national level regarding the cost and
quality of new homes, Mr. Blanchard’s experiences in Congress, as Chief Executive
of a border state, and as Ambassador during the period that NAFTA became a
reality, give him a unique perspective on a these critical concerns.
   In recent months the home building industry has been hit with two rounds of
protective tariffs on Canadian imported timber, which the NAHB believes will
raise the cost of the average home by $1,500 and drive 400,000 American families
out of the new housing market.
   Furthermore, many of Genesee County’s economic development plans are tied
to its location along I-69 (which will ultimately link Canada and Mexico),
with focus on “Flint” being a distribution center for transporting the products
of North American free trade.
   Although Blanchard will be addressing these issues in his appearance next
Wednesday, we shouldn't ignore the fact that he's currently the “front runner”
in his attempt to, once again, serve as Michigan’s Governor. Recent polls
show him with a strong, and growing, lead over Attorney General Granholm for
the Democrat nomination, and a resounding lead over likely GOP nominee, Lieutenant
Governor Dick Posthumus.
   So, although this shouldn’t be considered a campaign appearance, an understanding
of how Jim Blanchard perceives issues relating to the economic future of the
Flint area in general, and the home building industry in particular, may well
serve to guide us in making electoral decisions in August and November.
   Wednesday’s meeting will also feature the formal installation of Steve Edwards
as President, Steve Lissner as 1st V.P., and Mark Nemer as the new Secretary.
17.2 million vehicles sold during ‘01’s (recession?)
   As we were finishing up this newsletter, CNN reported that U.S. auto sales
climbed in December as the industry ended a “difficult year” with a “strong
end.” We’re changing this article to reflect that report, due to the fact
that it coincides with so much written in this issue in regards to the housing
industry at a time economists say the nation’s in recession, and has been
for the final 9 months of the year.
   According to CNN’s website, GM sold 357,748 light trucks and cars during the
month, up 6.8% from December ‘00, as Ford sold 281,158 vehicles, slightly
above last December. For the year, GM’s total sales were down 1.1%, while
Ford’s fell 6%.
   It also reported that Chrysler said U.S. vehicle sales were up six percent
over last year’s final month. However, its total sales for the year fell 10%.
   Notes the site, although final sales figures are not available, “it appears
the strong fourth quarter allowed the industry to post its second-best sales
year ever. Ford estimates total U.S. light vehicle sales will come in at 17.2
million, trailing only the 17.4 million sold in 2000, and topping the nearly
17 million sold in ‘99, previously the second best year.”
   Obviously, the 0% financing incentives were credited with the remarkable results.
So, what can we expect now the the 0% has come to an end?
   Well, GM announced at the same time it was about to offer $2,002 in incentives
for 2002. And, it’s likely the other companies will follow suit.
   Still, incentives or not, sales data continues to suggest that the consumer
isn’t folding up .. .. and that’s a good sign.
   In recent years, the Federal Government has continuously lauded
the growth in the rate of U.S. homeownership, which set a new record in last
year’s third quarter at 67.9%. And, the housing industry has taken pride in
its role regarding the rise, as homeownership creates wealth for the nation’s
families, and stability for communities across the nation.
   Well, a recent Wall Street Journal brief, noting that the nation’s
“homeownership rate increased in all but a handful of states in 2000 compared
with 1995,” sent us running to the Census Bureau’s website for further information.
Why? Because it also stated that “Great Plains, East South Central and Great
Lakes’ states had the highest rates of homeownership, due to lower home prices
and fewer opportunities to rent. Michigan topped all states with a 77.2% ownership
rate for an additional reason: its many higher wage factory workers.”
   For the final half of the last decade, the nation’s homeownership rate rose
from 64.7% to 67.4%. But during the same period, Michigan’s rate soared from
72.2% to 77.2%. To put that in perspective, in 1995 the state’s homeownership
rate was 11.6% greater than the nation’s. Last year it was 14.5 percent greater.
   Census data show homeownership data dating back to 1984. From ‘84 through
1994, the rate actually declined, ever so slightly, at both the national and
state level, as is evident in the chart below. Then, as the economic expansion
continued to roll, homeownership steadily rose during the rest of the ‘90s.
   However, while the rate of increase was 4.2% across the nation, Michigan’s
rate rose a whopping 6.9%. A likely reason Michigan outperformed the rest
of the nation may well be tied to 1994’s passage of proposal “A,” drastically
slashing property tax payments, thereby making homes affordable to many who
were previously unable to make the payments.
(Note: If you live in a state that starts with “M,” you’re far more
likely to be a homeowner. Five states have ownership rates above 75%: Michigan,
Maine, Minnesota, Mississippi, and West Va. {also, 100% of all states with
independent party governors hit 75%})
   Most businesses outside of the financial industry are totally
unaware that they may be incurring significant liability under state unclaimed
property laws. Just about every state requires property holders to report
and deliver abandoned and unclaimed property to the state. Typical types of
unclaimed properties include:
· Account credit balances
· Security and other deposits
· Customer overpayments
· Uncashed refund checks
· Uncashed accounts payable checks
· Unused gift certificates
· Returned interest and dividend check
· Credit memos Uncashed payroll checks
   Many business owners believe these unclaimed items belong to them, but under
the state laws business owners are required to turn over, or escheat them
to the state if certain conditions leading to the presumption of abandonment
are met.
   Generally, intangible property is deemed to have been abandoned if held or
issued in the ordinary course of business and not claimed for a period of
five years after it became payable or distributable. For payroll checks, the
period may be a short as one year. Businesses holding unclaimed property are
generally required to file an annual report with the state listing the property,
and to deliver the property within specified time frames. Persons failing
to file such reports can be subject to interest and penalties. A number of
states have recently intensified their efforts to enforce unclaimed property
losses and threatened severe penalties if companies did not file reports within
a specified amnesty period. Some states are also increasing their audit capability
and performing a greater number of unclaimed property audits. Obviously, these
factors increase the risk of exposure.
R, P & T
   As the 1980s came to an end a dozen years ago, we were as happy
to see that decade go as most were to say goodbye to 2001. It was a decade
where Michigan became the ultimate symbol of a declining rust belt state,
decimated by the worst recession since World War II, and struggling to maintain
its economic base. However, the decisions made to alleviate the pain on Michigan
business in the late ‘80s, along with the growth experienced by the U.S. economy
allowed Michigan to thrive for the next 11 years.
   Now, as we enter 2002, the state’s experiencing its first, noticeable, economic
downturn since the mid ‘80s. But we’re looking at recovery from a totally
different perspective.
   I’m reminded of the differences because of our speaker at the January meeting,
former Governor James J. Blanchard. In the ‘80s, we often blamed the state’s
problems on his party’s control of the legislature, despite having a Republican
Governor, since the early 1960s. And, we were somewhat justified in assigning
that blame. So, in 1982, ‘86, and ‘90, we strongly opposed his gubernatorial
aspirations.
   Times have changed dramatically since those days. The GOP controls the legislature,
the economy’s been relatively good, and few crises have existed in recent
years.
   But, perhaps the most evident change is how we look at enhancing our economy.
In the ‘80s and early ‘90s, the Flint area based its future on preserving
GM Jobs and building a theme park. Today, it looks to take advantage of its
natural gift (its location) to become an international trade oriented distribution
center.
   The point is, although the former Governor may not of been our man for the
‘80s, he could be for the 21st Century.
Beyond Seinfeld: It’s still about "Nothing"
in particular
Atlas Mixing it with HIP-HOP: Forever?
  Now it all makes sense. Late last month the gossip columns wrote
that Pam Anderson was seeking to have former husband (Motley Crue drummer)
Tommy Lee’s child visitation rights revoked. It’s now obvious that her concern
related, not so much for the kids, but how her new neighbors would
react to the heavy metal bad boy making frequent appearances in her new community,
Lake Shinanguag in Atlas Township. That’s right, the Flint Journal’s
front page story on December 19, coupled with Ms. Anderson’s court appearance,
suggests Kid Rock will, in all probability, be moving to the Township,
long known as a hotbed of anti-growth zealotry. And, judging by Ms. Anderson’s
concerns, it looks like the currently happy couple want to “fit in” with their
new “Home Town.”
   So, it came as little surprise when a Rock ‘n Roll insider reported that Kid
Rock was already in his Ortonville studio, working on an album, “NIMBY in
the Making,” expected to be released in conjunction with the closing on their
Atlas Township digs next spring.
   Genesee County has been hit with several celebrity relocation disappointments
in the past decade, but our unnamed “in-sider” says this one’s real, and suggests
more are coming.
A “New” (American) religion in the UK?
   Well, the Pilgrims left England in search of religious freedom
in America. Now, we find that an American based sect is apparently flourishing
in the motherland, proving that Hollywood’s impact stretches far across the
pond. Taken from the Parade Magazine “Best and Worst” of everything section
comes the following: “Centuries after King Arthur, a new wave of knight is
wandering Britain — and Luke Skywalker would be proud.”
   “When asked their religious affiliation on 2001 Census forms, many Britons
wrote in ‘Jedi Knight’ — so many, in fact, that the government was forced
to give ‘Jedi Knight’ its own category when compiling census results.”
   “Stay tuned for the census sequel: The Empire Strikes Back.”
Parade also noted the “Best (academic) Major” at American universities, making
some of us wonder why we had to be born so early. Notes the magazine, “at
least 1,400 students at eight universities are majoring in ....... golf. One
school just opened a $1.1 million ‘learning laboratory’ — a model clubhouse.....Fore
what?”
   Perhaps that explains why University of Michigan’s golf course may become
the new home of the Buick Open. They’re probably planning a golf program to
help in the recruitment of quarterbacks and basketball players (two species
known for their propensity to golf). Or, its possible that Keniesiology program
they put the other jocks in may be getting too difficult.
   Along with the address by former Governor/Ambassador Blanchard,
January’s meeting will feature the official installation of association officers
for 2002. When the association decided to host a holiday open house (rather
than a traditional Christmas Party), it moved the installation to the first
general membership meeting of the year. Also, the evening’s social hour will
be sponsored by several of the institutions that normally sponsor cocktails
and hors d’oeuvres at the annual Christmas Party.
   As we’ve noted in past Veritas issues, Bonaparte’s will be home
to all meetings this year. Furthermore, we’re committed to bringing
important, timely speakers, like Governor Blanchard. So join us in kicking
off what promises to be an exciting year that will make your membership in
this association a valuable experience: Member dinners free; Guests cost $20.
Since we have to give the restaurant a minimum number of attendees on Friday,
by 10:00 a.m. So, we urge you to R.S.V.P by 4:30 p.m. Thursday, January 10th.
   The (Parade of Homes) committee met! Since there were no surprises, the Spring Parade will open on its traditional Mothers’ Day weekend (May 11th), closing on the 26th. Hours will remain at noon to six on weekends, 5 to 8 p.m. Wednesday through Friday. The entry fee will remain at $2,500 (multiple homes by same builder receive $750 discount). Since the committee met at the end of last year, we’ll be sending out the registration forms in early January. If you don’t receive one and wish to participate, give the association a call at 603-2200.
   Look for two important Land Development council meetings early this
year. One regarding coming soil erosion rules, and on with the road commission.
Economic Update: So, now the turnaround’s in progress?
   It’s just been around six weeks since the National Bureau of Economic
Research’s declaration that the nation’s been in recession since March, and
now there’s so much evidence of a growth resurgence economists all across
the board seem to be writing obituaries for recession ‘01. Two days prior
to the year’s end came reports that housing, consumer confidence, and business
investment, all showed “surprising and widespread improvement,” suggesting
to many analysts that the end of the recession may (always cautious) well
be in sight. Then, on the first day after the new year, the closely watched
index of manufacturing activity of the National Association of Purchasing
Management (NAPM), which is viewed as a primary indicator of the health of
the manufacturing sector, displayed a “surge” in activity during the final
month of the year.
   The NAPM index, which has showed the sector contracting for 17 consecutive
months, jumped from 44.5 the previous month, to 48.2 in December (the cautious
economists had expected the index to come in at 45.8). Although the reading
(below 50) suggests the sector continues to contract, it’s now surged nearly
9 points in two months. Furthermore, the organization’s “new orders” index
rose to 54.9 — its highest level since April 2000 — and its inventories’ index
fell, suggesting the combination of new orders and lower inventories will,
ultimately, result in a turnaround for the sector.
While late December reports showing solid growth in the housing industry were
being released, the Conference Board announced its Index of Consumer Confidence
surged to 93.7, up from November’s 84.9, putting confidence nearly back to
pre-9/11 levels, in line with the University of Michigan’s earlier report
that put confidence in December up to 88.8 from 83.9 at the end of November.
   But, perhaps, more important, was the report from the Commerce Department
that orders for capital goods (unrelated to defense), an important indicator
of business investment, jumped 4.8% during November, on the heels of a 5.9%
rise in October. Adding the Purchasing Index report to the two month surge
in capital goods’ spending, may present the strongest evidence that the manufacturing
decline is coming to an end.
Leading Indicators rise again
   For the second consecutive month, the Conference Board’s Index of Leading
Economic Indicators, designed to forecast economic activity six months in
advance, rose 0.5%, well ahead of the 0.3% forecasts by an economic consensus.
While six of the ten indicators were on the rise, the four dealing with manufacturing
continued their downward direction. However, the subsequent rises in manufacturing
data will likely lead to a turnaround there, as well.
   Just prior to Christmas, the Commerce Department announced that its
final revision of 3rd quarter Gross Domestic Product found the economy contracting
1.3%.
   Despite all of the new optimism, there is one particularly critical
reason for concern: The recent rises in market set interest rates (bonds,
mortgages, etc.) and the emerging federal deficit. First of all, the bond
market has been a flaw- less indicator of future Federal Reserve action in
recent years. Secondly, the need for the government to borrow, indefinitely,
to meet its fiscal obligations, doesn’t hold well for the future of interest
rates. Interestingly enough, many who’ve said balancing the budget would lead
to a 2% reduction in mortgage rates, have acted like the biggest budget busters
in the past year.
Even the “Realtors” say '01 "may" break record
At the year’s end, the National Association of Realtors, when reporting
that sales of existing single family homes sold at a rate of 5.21 million
in November, admitted the data “set the stage for a possible record year.”
Although we’ve been claiming the likelihood of a “record” since mid summer,
this is the first time the NAR has suggested such.
   For the first 11 months of the year, existing homes have sold at a pace of
5.25 million units, nearly 1% ahead of the 5.205 million sold in 1999, the
all time record. If December’s pace fell to the lowest rate of any month during
the past three years, the record would be beaten by approximately 9,000 units.
New Homes continue to sell at record pace
   The same day, the Department of Commerce reported that new single family homes
sold at an estimated rate of 934,000 units in November, up 6% from October’s
revised rate of 878,000. Though the first eleven months of the year, a total
of 844,000 new homes were sold, up 4% from 2000’s level of 877,000.
   Currently, the all time record for new single family sales was 885,000, in
1998. If 2001 sales beat the previous year by just 1%, they would set a new
record.However, the average monthly sales rate for 2001 has been 908,000,
a pace that would beat the ‘98 record by 2.6%.
Housing starts/permits also soared in November
   Builders broke ground on new housing units at an annual rate of 1.645 million
in November, up 8% from the previous month’s rate according to the Commerce
Department. Furthermore, permits were pulled at a rate of 1.56 million for
the month, 5% higher than in October. Both reports shattered economists’ expectations
and suggested that 2001 will end as another exceptional year for the housing
industry.
   Single family homes were begun at a rate of 1.261 million for the month, bringing
the monthly average rate to 1.273 million, a pace that represents the second
strongest year (1,303,000 were started in ‘99).
Michigan/Region remain
   As we point out in the brief on Michigan’s new
housing activity, the state’s building permit authorizations, in recent months,
have been running at their slowest pace in the post “Proposal A” era. And,
the drop in activity seems to be based right here in the state’s Southeast
sector.
   For example, according to the U.S. Department of Commerce, the state’s been
averaging approximately 52,500 permits annually (43,300 single family) for
the past five years (nearly identical numbers to 2000). And, as is evident
in the chart to the left, state wide single family activity is off nearly
1,900 units in comparison to ‘00, representing a 4.8% decline.
   However, if we examine the data from the “Detroit” sector of Metro-Detroit,
we find a decline of 2,119 single family units, and the total “Metro-Detroit”
area, including Ann Arbor and Flint, is off by 1,998 units. So, the rest of
Michigan is actually running ahead of 2000.
   The one sector of the Metro-Detroit area that continues to run strong is the
“Flint” sector, primarily Genesee County, with total housing activity up 24.8%
by census figures, and 33.4% according to Housing Consultants of Clarkston.
And, regarding permits for “owner occupied” housing, Housing Consultants
has Genesee County up 10.8%, while the government’s single family data has
“Flint” up 10.5%.
   Obviously, everything we’ve reported are merely preliminary. However, when
we finally see year end data, we’d expect that Genesee County’s total number
will likely surpass 1999’s modern day record.
NAHB’s Index shows big
NAHB’s Housing Market Index (HMI) rose 8 points last month to 57, the biggest
jump since ‘98 and marking a return to the general range of builder optimism
that was evident prior to 9/11. Each of the HMI’s components, current sales,
expected sales & and model traffic rose 8 points.