Inside Veritas -
Article 1
- 4th quarter existing home prices plunge while home values soar
Article 2
- Warning! OSB Price Replay?
Article 3 - Auto Sales: Still the Same Old Story
Article 4 - Taxation and Finance - Audits — New IRS Audit
Initiatives
Article 5 -
Association News Update From Laura
Economic Update - Like that manufacturing
“jobs” data
BS: Still about Nothing in
particular
Housing Industry Update
Would you like to see a previous Veritas Issues? Click Here
4th quarter existing home prices plunge while home values soar
   Since mortgage rates fell below the 7% level in late ‘01, rises
in home prices have consistently eclipsed the actual increase in home values.
That is, until the end of last year, when prices and values went in opposite
directions.
   Two weeks ago, the National Association of Realtors reported the median price
of an existing home in the nation’s metropolitan areas grew 6.6% since the
fourth quarter of 2002. However, in comparison to the 3rd quarter, prices
were down 3% at $171,600.
   Then, on March 1, the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO)
released its 4th quarter House Price Index (HPI) showing that home values
appreciated 7.97% during the previous 12 months on the heels of a whopping
3.67% rise in the year’s final quarter, “or an annualized rate of 14.67% (In
the 3rd quarter, median prices were up 9.9%; HPI up 5.6%).
   In previous quarters we’d frequently see median prices in many metropolitan
areas that were more than double the actual rate of appreciation as measured
by the HPI.
   For example, Los Angeles’ 3rd quarter median price rose 25.4% but its HPI
was up 11.6%. Baltimore’s median to HPI ratio was 17.8 to 8.6; Denver’s was
7.4 to 1.4; and Daytona’s - 19.7 to 9.1.
   But for the 4th quarter, the extreme discrepancies were in the opposite direction.
For example, Milwaukee’s median price was down 1.2% for the year, but its
HPI was up a solid 7.83%. Or how about Akron, with prices off 5.3% and values
up 3.5%; or Birmingham, AL with prices down 3.7 and values up 4.3.
   Along with milder price level rises, the Realtors also reported
the 2nd strongest sales quarter in history during ‘03’s final three months.
Although one quarter’s inconclusive, it’s likely that robust sales for the
past six years, that drove prices up 44%, have pretty well saturated demand
in the “move-up” markets in many of the most populated areas.
   Furthermore, with employment data and income growth lagging, it’s unlikely
large numbers of buyers are capable of making commitments at high prices.
   So, it’s likely a market trend is developing, with activity at more affordable
prices. And, if interest rates rise, look for that trend to accelerate.
Local: Michigan continued to lag well behind the nation, with 4.2% appreciation over the past 12 months. Flint was at 4.11%, while Detroit ranked 182 of the 220 metro areas at 3.62%. Interestingly enough, Saginaw was tops in the state, at 5.5%, followed by Lansing at 5.46%
   Last July we were hit with a barrage of calls regarding the soaring
price of OSB board. A number of builders who had bid homes in spring, were
finding the increases were cutting their margins drastically, while others
were “shell shocked” when pricing homes to bid.
   After rising 34% from January to May, OSB prices virtually exploded last summer,
doubling from May to August. And, they continued to rise into November before
falling back the final six weeks of the year.
As we approach spring of ‘04, the industry’s situation is similar in comparison
to ‘03’s, according to Jeff Fuhs of PAL, a Midwestern lumber coop based in
Grand Rapids.
   Fuhs explains that demand is, at this point, as solid as ‘03’s, and will likely
remain so as long as historically low mortgage rates continue to stimulate
record level housing starts. Fuhs says the higher prices of 2003 were a “pure
result of supply and demand,” and notes that demand is showing no sign of
weakening. To emphasize that point, he presents an update on prices, showing
nearly a $5 (per 1,000 feet) rise per day since the 1st of the year. Well,
if we look at building activity over the past 3 months, we find that it’s
11.5% ahead of the same period a year earlier. So, it’s hardly a surprise
that demand for OSB is driving the price back toward ‘03 levels.
   In fact, Wednesday night, the Wall Street Journal posted an article
on its website noting that, “according to Random Lengths, the composite price
of structural panels has jumped 60%, to an all time high of $571 per thousand
feet from $356 in December.” Furthermore, the “WSJ” noted that the composite
price of framing lumber is already up 17% from December, at $384 per 1,000
board feet.
   So, we advise builders to remain is close touch with their respective lumber
suppliers during the coming months in anticipation of rising prices. And,
keep in mind, last year’s OSB prices doubled from May to August. If housing
remains strong, it could easily happen in 2004.
Barry
  The Wall Street Journal article read, “U.S.
car and light truck sales rose 4.8% last month,” in comparison to February
‘03, as “Japanese auto makers outperformed the overall market and Detroit’s
Big Three.” While GM and D/C showed gains of 5.6% and 1.2% respectively,
it was Ford’s turn to show a loss.
   However, that island nation’s “big 3” all experienced gains, led by Nissan
(up 46%) and Toyota(+18%), with Honda at +7%). So, U.S. Companies
continued to lose market share to Japan’s.
   For the first two months of ‘04, Big 3 market share fell to 59%
(it was 60.4% at this point last year), while Japan’s hit 31.2% (v 28.6 in
‘03). And, while Daimler/Chrysler raised its YTD share to 14.6%, Toyota narrowed
the gap in its quest to be “America’s #3” auto maker. The Japanese giant controlled
12.1% of the market, up from 10.6% a year ago.
   But the biggest gainer was Nissan, up 1.5% to 6.1%. In other words, Japan’s
third biggest company had a 33% gain, well beyond Toyota’s 14.2% increase.
   When you read statistics about the percentage of returns that
are audited, you might feel justified in playing the odds that your business
won't be among those selected by the IRS for scrutiny. But the numbers are
very misleading, because the IRS is getting a lot smarter about how it chooses
returns for audit and how its examiners conduct their audits.
   Over the past few years, the IRS has dramatically stepped up its efforts to
study specific industries, and to educate its examiners about business practices,
terminology, accounting methods, and common industry practices. It has also
identified areas of inquiry that produce audit results.
   Examiners are told specifically to look out for certain red flags to get at
what is really going on in a business or transaction. The result is examinations
are now sharply focused on potential areas that will generate increased taxes,
penalties, and interest. Fortunately, there is a positive side to all of this.
The IRS has made public a number of its Industry Specialization Program papers
and Market Segment Specialization Program manuals. These help us keep up on
the areas that the IRS will be targeting in its audits. So far it has issued
detailed audit guide information on a range of industries, from general ones,
such as retailing, to more specific ones, such as construction contractors
and special trades businesses. Much more information on specific industries
is expected to be issued as the IRS continues to devote resources to the development
of these programs.
   Another IRS initiative tries to improve compliance by meeting with representatives
of various industries to work out understandings with them about specific
tax problems. For example, the IRS and the food service industry have come
to an understanding about properly determining and reporting employee tips.
Employers that comply will face reduced IRS scrutiny on this issue. A review
of your business practices with your professional tax advisor may help keep
your returns from being selected for examination, or help you survive if your
return is audited.
R, P & T
Beyond Seinfeld: It’s still about "Nothing"
in particular
Growing Market: Senior Citizens “Living in Sin”
   In our continued desire to keep home builders fully aware of emerging
housing markets, we thought we’d heard it all in relation to “housing trends,”
until the Wall Street Journal published an article about “Seniors Shacking
Up.” The article told how “senior citizens are now the most vocal members”
of an advocacy group called the Alternatives to Marriage Project.
   The group is designed to protect the rights of live-in couples who aren’t
bound in matrimony. And, we find that, at least in the 65+ age group, we’re
looking at an incredibly fast growing segment of the housing market.
   That's right! While the President has proposed $1.5 billion to promote “Healthy
Marriages,” with mentoring programs where older couples guide younger ones,
we find census data suggesting that the number of older couples shunning marriage
for “shacking up” has doubled in the past fourteen years. However, the article
notes that social researchers believe those numbers are much higher. And it
also notes that, as “free spirited baby boomers age, cohabitation is expected
to soar further.”
   We don’t know how significant this market is, currently, in southeast Michigan.
But, as we note below, Michigan is developing a “California Lifestyle.” So,
we urge all to prepare to cater to this emerging market!
“Seinfeld” Briefs:
  
   We were kind of shocked to see the AP headline, “Passion tickets
bear ‘mark of the beast,” but when we found the venue, it all made sense.
The article noted that “the number 666 is appearing on movie tickets for (Mel)
Gibson’s film at a Georgia theater, drawing complaints from some moviegoers.”
Ironically, the theater in question is in ROME, GA.
# # #
   Now that last month’s note on the 20 year anniversary of a Yalie president
(1/20/05) is a reality, we can now say Skull & Bones forever. Both, John Kerry
and George W. Bush are members of that Yale “secret society” that some critics
believe is part of an occultist conspiracy for world domination.
   Though we may not subscribe to the conspiracy theory (unless Oliver
Stone produces a convincing movie on the subject), one has to find it odd
that a society that limits its membership to 15 men each year could dominate
the nominating process in both political parties ... and, the fact that it
happened at the beginning of the new millennium (Gore’s nomination was from
the ‘old’ millennium) gives even the most skeptical cause for concern.
# # #
   Had to note the Flint Journal’s editorial lauding Jennifer Granholm
bringing her Health Conscious California mentality to Michigan’s overweight
population (noting her anti-smoking crusade and trim figure) ... of course,
with it nearing March 15th, we could paraphrase Caesar regarding her “lean
and hungry look” and, “when she thinks too much, we know this woman can be
dangerous."
  
|
   New Members' Perdue Construction, Maple Creek Homes Corporation, J & J Design Build Services, LLC, Melvin Joslin Builder, Melvin Joslin Emil Kovacs Custom Builders, Alexander Homes,
|
Spring Parade    With the final Parade deadline of March 8th upon us, we
can report that there will be 31 homes entered in this year's event
(as of 3/4/04). The Spring Parade will open May 8th and run through
May 23rd. The following Builders are entered: G.D. Builder Inc.,
Lausman Homes, Artisan Builders, J & J Design Build Services, Kenneth
Lowe Builder, Tom Atwell Homes, Pine Hollow Custom Homes, Future Homes,
Westminster Abbey Homes, DCC Development Corp., Adler Homes, J.M. Developments,
Swank Builders, Maple Creek Developments, Alexander Homes, Keene Development,
Bald Mountain Homes, J.W. Morgan Construction, SonRise Homes (2), Howard
Enterprizes, Maple Creek Homes, Lexington Properties, Creekwood Homes,
Mitch Harris Building Co (2), American Associates, Riske Custom Homes,
C & L Homes, HRC Building Co & Woodside Builders. |
March General Membership Meeting    Mark your calendars for Wednesday, March 24th, for our next General Membership Meeting to be held at Bonaparte's. PrintComm will be the meeting sponsor and we are still setting up the final details for the program at print time, but we are hoping to get a few of our State Representatives to join us that evening (no this is not a political meeting, but rather a way in which the residential construction industry concern can be heard by our Reps.) All members must call by 3/17/04 if they will be attending the meeting (810-603-2200) and please note all guest are 20.00 and should be paid at the meeting check-in table. |
|
Economic Update: Like that manufacturing “jobs” data
  Since employment in the manufacturing sector began to deteriorate
in late 2000 (and with the sector so critical to Michigan’s health), we began
following the Institute of Supply Management’s monthly “Manufacturing Index”
closely. And, throughout the past two years, it was disappointing to find
the sector’s activity often on the rise, with employment continuing to contract.
However, by late 2003, with the sector showing continual signs of growth,
we experienced a pleasant surprise in November, as sector employment turned
up, after 37 consecutive months of decline. Then in February, not only did
the upturn continue for the fourth consecutive month, it rose at its fastest
pace since the end of 1987.
   Since the rise in the factory employment index hasn’t resulted in higher sector
employment figures previously, we cautiously await tomorrow’s (Friday) Labor
Department “Jobs” report. However, we suspect the numbers to show in a positive
light, which may set off a barrage of optimism we’ve that’s been so long awaited.
Growth
   Last week the Commerce Department announced a slight increase in its 4th quarter
growth estimate of 0.1%. This time, economists had anticipated that the revision
would be negative.
   What was more important than the actual rise was what brought it about. In
the original estimate, spending by businesses shot up 6.9%. However, the revision
showed it rising 9.6%, as spending on equipment and software soared by 15.1%.
And, a sustainable increase in capital spending seems to be just what the
economy needs, as its more likely to result in rising employment opportunities.
Sentiment Highest in 3+ Years
   The other positive sign was the U-M sentiment index, showing consumers more
positive than at any time since the end of the year 2000.
  Well, if January is any indication, there’s little reason to expect
a slowdown (of any significance) from 2003’s record levels of housing activity.
Although most data that were released were below December’s all time record
levels, the declines were not unexpected due to the extremely harsh winter.
And, despite the harshness of that winter, most data were far ahead of January
‘03.
   For example, housing starts came in at a rate of 1.903 million,
down from 2.067 million in December. However, the number was 4.1% above the
January ‘03 rate of 1.828 million. (Single family’s rate was 1.537 million,
up 1.9% from a year earlier).
   Even Michigan’s activity (where the winter was particularly harsh)
was up slightly from last year. And, the local area despite a large decline
from December, experienced a solid increase in January in its owner occupied
sector. There were 91 units authorized during the first month of the year,
in comparison to 73 in ‘03 (up nearly 25%), according to U.S. Government data.
And, Housing Consultants’ data had Genesee County up 54% over the previous
year, and the total Metro-Detroit area up 5.5% (although down slightly when
rentals are included).
   Although we don’t put much faith in construction data until the end of the
first quarter (at least regarding trends), it was notable that the coldest
January in years appears to have had little, if any, impact on construction
activity.
Sales
   While new home sales fell to an annual rate of 1.106 million units last month,
which was 1.7 percent below December’s rate, they were a solid 9.6% above
the rate of slightly over a million last January. But what was more notable
is that the median price of a new home was at $197,000, up 8.4% from a year
earlier. Furthermore, the rate of sales remained well above the year end record
(set in ‘03) of 1.085 million.
   Existing home sales’ activity remained above the 6 million unit level for
the 6th consecutive month at 6.04 million. And, like the rest of January’s
data, was softer than December but well above January ‘03.
   However, what may be more notable, was the median price increase of just 5.4%
over the previous 12 months. Since peaking in July, annual price increases
have been steadily in decline each month.
Building Materials’
   Prices A couple of interesting items appeared in regards to prices of
building materials, besides the OSB issue covered in this issue. A Wall
Street Journal article told of the plight of materials manufacturers who
have been able to raise prices only "slightly," due to expanding
capacity in the 1990's to take advantage of the booming industry. So, these
companies (GA Pacific, Johns Manville, Weyerhaeuser noted in particular) haven’t
been getting rich despite the continued housing boom.
   The other item, told of the soaring rises in Lumber and, particularly, OSB,
two items that aren’t in the position of keeping up with demand, and are experiencing
almost daily price increases.
   But, both articles focused on one other point: The impact of consolidation
in the building industry, and the emergence of building giants. These large
companies buy in large volume, and subsequently lock in prices for months
at a time. For example, Toll Brothers said they signed a twelve
month contract for lumber in July at $302 per 1,000 board feet. The going
price by mid February was $384, and is likely over $500 today.
   And, that’s from a company where the average price of a home has risen from
$383,000 to $589,000 in just the past five years.