November 2006

Inside Veritas -
Article 1 -
Parade closes with pleasantly surprising traffic results
Article 2 -
Existing Market Activity
Article 3 - Housing and Economic Briefs: GDP weakest since '03; Jobs "strong?"
Article 4 - Appeals' Court: "Don't tax new public improvements"
Article 5 - Taxation and Finance by Rachor; Purman & Tucker CPAs
Energy Tax Credit Revisited
Article 6 -
October auto sales rise 6.1%, but
Association News Update
New Construction and Sales Activity
BS: Still about Nothing in particular
Would you like to see a previous Veritas Issues? Click Here

Parade closes with pleasantly surprising traffic results

Last month we wrote about “hundreds of people” coming out to view the models during this year’s Fall Parade’s open-ing weekend. Well, that was under sunny skies and nearly perfect conditions.

So, what about the remainder of the event with its grey skies, rain and chills? Well, we were clearly, and pleasantly, surprised that the response to the event seemed to increase as the weeks went by. In fact, many of the participants said the final weekend, under the most dismal conditions, was exceptional, even in comparison to events of the past.
But, considering the state of the Southeast Michigan housing industry, our concerns that lead up to the opening of the event reflected on much more than “traffic.”

While we’ve historically been successful bringing the public to the Parade, we have little control over their mood, particularly as it relates to investing in housing. And, it’s obvious by the housing data we publish each month that fewer and fewer area residents are in the kind of “mood” to make those decisions, which is why we stress the advantages of new home products and designs rather than looking at a home from an “investment” perspective.

What we found during the event is much stronger demand for those “advantages” than we perceived. In fact, the response to the fall parade was similar to that in the spring...however, its benefits were spread among fewer builders.

While the sales on new builds, and even remodeling jobs, that were made during the event weren’t large by early 2000s’ standards, they appeared that way to the builders who were the beneficiaries of the sales’ activity. And, what was most fascinating, is that builders who’ve been parade participants for years said it was the first time they’ve made multiple sales during an event.

But what was most notable, as with the spring parade, were the number of current homeowners who had given up on selling their home, and were looking to update to 21st Century standards, often from a purely custom perspective.

Yes, the market’s clearly down in comparison to recent years, but we learned again that the “overall” residential construction market is stronger than appearances. And, the Fall Parade participants were the ones that reaped the benefits.

 

Back To Top


Existing Market Activity


While existing homes sold at a rate of 6.18 million units (off 2% from August) in September, they were down 14.2% from their ‘05 level of 7.2 million units. However, the bigger issue with the NAR’s September report was a continued erosion of the median price. Not only did the national median fall again, and remain below the year earlier price, but the NAR revised August’s price downward to $224,000, increasing the year-to- year decline for that month as well.

If there was a positive tone in the realtors’ monthly report, it’s a decline total inventory of 93,000 homes. But, at the lower rate of sales, that still represented a 7.3 months’ supply. Furthermore, a decline in inventory is as likely to reflect a number of homes taken off the market as listings expired (as much as fewer homes going on the market).

We can find interesting, if not illuminating, is the “Realtors” spin on the report: It’s economist (David Lereah) called it a sign of sales “stabilizing,” and he further noted the “worst is behind us as far as a market correction.” Then again, he also said we’d experience median prices rising in the 6% range this year ... credibility?

State and Local

As you can see below, recent sales’ data for Michigan is anything but buoyant.

Through the third quarter we find sales are down 14.4% in the state, 17% locally, with average prices off 1.6% and 10% respectively. But, what’s more troubling is the third quarter’s downward trend, on the heels of a steadily weakening local market.

The annual rate of sales, which was 5,567 in the 1st quarter and 5,177 in the 2nd, fell to 4,895 in the third, leaving a 17.7 months’ supply of homes on the market (up from 13.1 months in the first quarter). And, while each quarter is substantially weaker than the same period in 2005, we’ve entered a quarter where sales were at a 4,858 rate last year.

So, if the trend continues, look for year end sales in the 4,600 range for all of 2006, which will translate to a decline of roughly 22% for the year.

Back To Top


Housing and Economic Briefs: GDP weakest since '03; Jobs "strong?"

Economic growth slowed to its slowest pace in 3 years during the third quarter and, guess what industry’s getting the “blame?” Nearly every art-icle about the anemic (1.6%) Gross Domestic Product rate of growth refers to the housing downturn’s impact.

After growing at an exceptional 5.6% rate during the 1st quarter, the economy grew at a more tepid 2.6% in the 2nd, and was expected to grow in the 2% range during the third.

What we can’t help but find notable in economists’ analysis of the report is the apparent obsession with housing’s impact, particularly since the sector’s been in deep decline since late winter

Of course, the real focus in recent months on economic reports relates to “how will the Federal Reserve act?” And, a slowly growing economy with little inflation would suggest a move toward lowering rates.

So, when the inflation component of the GDP report had the core rate of measured at 2.3% (down from 2.7% in the 2nd quarter), a few, but not many, analysts thought it may move the Fed closer to easing. That was, until last Friday.

Last month we questioned the supposedly “weak” jobs’ report for September, noting the “report wasn’t all bad as it included an upward revision of 60,000 in August,” bringing the actual growth number to 111,000. Well, last month the jobs’ report missed its mark as well, with the Department of Labor reporting an increase of 92,000 jobs, well short of the anticipated 123,000. However, within the October chart was an upward revision for August and September’s payrolls of 139,000, meaning an increase of 231,000 jobs in comparison to what was perceived a month earlier.

Adding to those numbers is a downturn in the unemployment rate to its lowest level in more than five years.

As would be expected, this supposed “good news” jolted the financial markets as bond prices took a big hit, leading to the rise in mortgage rates we show on page 2 (Note: All markets turned back upward in two days).

But, what caught our eye were the media reports, which, as with the GDP report, seem obsessed with housing. Only this time, it was “mitigating concerns that housing downturn will sink the economy,” to quote the Wall Street Journal for example.
In the “Journal” report was an estimate from Mark Zandi (from Moody’s Economy.com) stating housing related sectors shed 99 thousand jobs since March, but other sectors added 1.2 million.

While traditional economists obsess about housing’s direct jobs impact, we’d like to remind Mr. Zandi about the impact of home appreciation on consumer spending. He, along with others, frequently referred to the homes as piggy banks’ concept, where consumers spent freely early in the decade based on the growing equity in their homes.
The GDP report showed consumer spending as “resilient,” in its ability to offset the downturn in housing. But we’d be remiss if we didn’t reflect on the likelihood that a potential downturn in values would, more than likely, im-pact spending in the reverse.
And, that “potential” downturn is now beginning to materialize.

With the preceding in mind, we found an article in Sunday’s Free Press most interesting: “Owners fret over property values” was the title, noting recent polling showing 44% of Michigan residents admit they’re worried about their home value. The survey of 670 homeowners was taken October 8th through 11th, and has a margin of error of 3.9 percent.
Much of the reason for worry stems from the state’s housing sales’ data through the 3rd quarter. While average prices are off 1.6% across the state, numbers in some parts of the Southeast region are currently approaching a decline of 10%. And, as we re-ported last month, even the federal House Price Index shows the states prices as being flat in the past year, and down in the 2nd quarter of this year.

The previous briefs got us thinking that we haven’t written about Michigan employment in the past few months. Well, the picture’s not pretty a pretty one.
September’s preliminary data show total employment down 33,000 jobs on both, the seasonally adjusted and actual scale, since September ‘05. However, even worse is the condition of the manufacturing sector, losing 38,300 jobs over the same period.
(Post Election Note: In the final 3 years of the Engler Administration, the state lost 157,600 manufacturing jobs; During the Granholm Administration, we lost 97,500, or 38% less --- Today, Mr. Engler is CEO of the National Association of Manufacturers)

Finally, it was hardly a surprise when voters approved the new, 1 mill, countywide property tax to fund local health care. After all, it had total support from the “business/ institutional community, with no real organized opposition.
Now, coupled with the new “senior citizens” millage passed in August (0.75 mills) the Countywide rate rises to approximately 16.4 mills, bringing Genesee’s countywide rate 71% above Oakland County’s 9.6 mills; and a whopping 128% higher than Livingston County’s 7.2 mills. To put that in perspective, monthly countywide taxes on a $200,000 home are: in Genesee ($137); in Oakland ($80); and in Livingston ($60).


Back To Top

Appeals' Court: "Don't tax new public improvements"

Raising the taxable value of property based on the value of “public improvements” is a violation of the “cap” in Proposal A, and therefore unconstitutional in Michigan, according to a unanimous ruling by the state Court of Appeals in October. A three judge panel upheld a Wayne Co Circuit Court ruling in Toll Northville LTD v Northville Twp., noting public service improvements on real property “do not constitute ‘additions’ as provided for in the (Michigan) Constitution” prior to Proposal A’s passage.

The definition of “additions” is the key to the ruling, since Prop “A” caps the increase in taxable value of real property at the lesser of 5% or the rate of inflation. However, “improvements” to the property can be taxed at their value.

As we’ve historically argued at the legislature, infrastructure is not part of the property, as it is dedicated (or owned) by municipalities or utility companies.

Now that an Appeals Court’s concurred, that position should now be considered state law. Of course, Northville will, in all likelihood, appeal to the Supreme Court, with full support from the Municipal League and Township Association, but historical ideology of the current justices suggests the their appeal will have little, if any, chance for success.

Back to top


Taxation and Finance by Rachor; Purman & Tucker CPAs
Energy Tax Credit Revisited

The Energy Policy Act of 2005 included a provision allowing eligible home builders to claim a tax credit worth up to $2,000 per qualifying home for the construction of new energy-efficient homes. The IRS recently issued guidance outlining the steps contractors must take to claim the tax credit.
Qualifying Requirements
A dwelling qualifies if:
· It is located in the U.S.,
· Its construction was completed after August 8, 2005,
· It meets specific energy-saving requirements, and
· It is acquired from the eligible contractor after ‘05 and before ‘08 for use as a residence.

The home must be constructed so that it uses at least 50% less energy on heating and cooling than a home built according to the standards of Section 404 of the 2004 Supplement to the 2003 International Energy Conservation Code.
In addition, improvements in the building envelope (materials or systems specifically designed to reduce heat loss or gain, exterior windows, doors, and duct sealing and infiltration reduction measures) must provide for a level of heating and cooling energy consumption that is at least 10% below that of a comparable dwelling unit.
Heating and cooling energy and cost savings must be calculated in accordance with the procedures prescribed in the Residential Energy Services Network (RESNET) Publication No. 05-001.

Certification
Before claiming the credit, a contractor must obtain the energy-efficient certification from an eligible certifier. While the certification need not be filed with the tax return on which the credit is claimed, it should be kept on file.
The certification should include the name, address, and phone number of the eligible certifier; the address of the house; a statement by the certifier that the house meets the energy saving requirements and that his or her field inspection confirms that the house complies with the design requirements; and a list containing the components of the house's building envelope and their energy performance ratings, as well as the heating and cooling equipment installed in the house. The certification should also identify the software used to calculate energy consumption and contain a signed declaration attesting to the truthfulness, accuracy, and completeness of the statements.

.Back to top

October auto sales rise 6.1%, but

While auto industry sales were rose last month, the increase was attributed to an “unusually” weak October ‘05, when U.S. auto companies stopped offering most of their employee discount prices to all and sales fell over 14%. The 1.22 million vehicle sales in October were actually 8.8% below 2004’s ten month level. Furthermore, the annual (adjusted) sales’ rate was 16.2 million, which was lower than the rate of 8 of the past 12 months.
While the new “Big Three” all experienced sales’ gains (GM [up 17.3%]; Ford [up 8%]; Toyota [up 9.2%]), Chrysler saw sales erode by 3,000 units (1.6%), and its market share continued to tumble back to 2004 levels. (Recall that Chrysler was the only “American” company to increase its share in ‘05).
While lower gas prices were believed to contribute to an upturn in truck sales, but again, that was from last October. And even there, only GM, Honda and Toyota showed double digit rises. Still domestic trucks increased their share to 45.7% of the market, which was the most since gas prices soared earlier this year.

Barry

Beyond Seinfeld: It’s still about "Nothing" in particular

Michigan's $65 million "Jackpot"

Would you have confidence in a “businessman” who would spend $35,000,000 of his own fortune to become Michigan’s governor --- Well, despite the fact that 1.6 million Michigan voters apparently would, Dick DeVos was overwhelmed in the gubernatorial race, winning just 42% of the vote, despite spending $41 million (85% of it his own). But through DeVos’ generosity (at least to Michigan TV stations) came the true “STAR” of the ‘06 campaign. We’re talking about his daughter (Alyssa), who headlined his best commercial of campaign. Yes, she looked great, and her personality charmed the audience. But most impressive was her ability to charm, while her father was blowing $35 million of her inheritance!

“Seinfeld” Briefs:
All across the nation the Democrats were on a “high” Wednesday morning, seizing a solid majority in the U.S. House, and looking like the “victor” in the Senate. However, of all the legislative races, the one that stands out to some of us is Joe Lieberman’s easy victory for a 4th term in Connecticut, not as a Democrat, but as an “Independent!”
We’d love to be in the room when Lieberman (who won 50% of the vote with primarily Republican and Independent support) meets his long time colleagues who came to his state to campaign for the billionaire Democrat who beat him in the primary, particularly since those same Dems will need his vote to organize as the “majority” party!

*****

The “Ugliest” legislative contest our media market’s ever been exposed to was the Saginaw Co. Senate race between Dr. Roger Khan (R) and Carl Williams (D). Khan began the TV barrage with an ad suggesting he “protects children” while Williams “protects predators,” and it deteriorated from there, with each accusing the other of lies and worse. What’s unfortunate is that both sides saw this as a winnable race, and pumped hundreds of thousands of dollars, so the barrage intensified, and continued (at least) through Tuesday morning.
By the time the smoke cleared, Williams seemed to have won by the narrowest of margins (around 300 votes), a gain for the Dems. But we can’t help but think that if Khan would have stressed his background and positions on issues, he would have won the race easily.

Close Call! We were relieved to see Dave Robertson hold his house seat as the only GOP legislator from the County. He was running behind for much of the night, and only held by 700 votes.

*****

The following was taken verbatim from the CNN web site: “You ever see a picture of her back then? Whew," New York Daily News political reporter Ben Smith quoted John Spencer (Republican opponent of Hillary Clinton) as saying Friday en route to a debate. "I don't know why Bill married her." The Daily News also reported that Spencer, 59, the former mayor of Yonkers, said Clinton had undergone "millions of dollars of work -- plastic surgery" to help improve her appearance. "She looks good now," Smith quoted Spencer as saying.”
Well, we found “before and after’s,” and these are two of the best ... So, you be the judge!!! Of course, Ms. Clinton remains the Senator, with roughly 70% of New Yorkers’ support.

Barry

Back to top


Association News and Events
by Laura

 

DON’T MISS the Holiday Open House on Thursday, December 7th, at the association office from 4 to 7 p.m.

The open house began as way to show appreciation to association members for support over the year, it’s become a “must attend” for many in the housing industry and related fields.

This year Laura and Tracey have even upgraded the hors d’oeuvres menu, and you can expect the the same type of libations, desserts and stimulating conversation we’ve had in previous years. So, plan to attend, and let us know: Call the BAMF office, or e-mail laura@bamfhome.com or tracey@bamfhome.com/.

 


 

Back To Top


New Construction and Sales Activity

Another Conundrum

As single-family housing starts “rose” 4.3% in September, their nine month decline jumped to 10.3%, up 17% from the eight month decline of 8.8%. In other words, despite headlines touting a rise (over August), September’s numbers were pathetically weak (20.3% below last September).
What’s more indicative of the state of the new housing industry (nationally) is the report on September’s sales, both month to month and year over year.
While sales were also up compared to August, a 9.3% drop in prices was largely responsible. And, when compared to a year earlier, sales were down 14.1% while prices fell 9.7%.
As you can see in the graph below, the median “new” home price actually slipped below the existing home median. Though we’ve been writing about a narrowing gap to illustrate builders’ advantages in pricing for a market over the past year, this represents the first time new home price levels actually fell below those for existing homes. And, that’s despite a sharp decline in existing home prices since July.
If there is a bright side to the sales’ report, it’s the 2% decline in inventory during the month. If that report proves to be accurate, it would be a real decline, unlike the existing homes’ data that probably reflect frustrated owners removing homes from the market due to lack of sales’ activity.

Local/Regional Activity

September was a bit more of the same as you can see by the charts to the right. Through the month, the 9 county, Southeast Michigan region is now running 46.2% behind ‘05 (56.2% compared to 04) according to Housing Consultants’ numbers, with Genesee, Livingston, Oakland and Washtenaw Counties 61% to 67% below 2004’s level.
In September 2004 we anticipated a 40% decline by 2006, and thought that was a rather dismal forecast. At that time we warned of the impact on state and local governments believing their housing revenue flow would continue at ‘04’s pace.
We further noted that a mere 10% decline in housing starts would result in the loss of more than 11,000 jobs and $101million in tax revenue to state and local units ........ try multiplying that by five or six!!!

Back To Top


Back To Top

Look Here for Previous Issues of Veritas