Inside Veritas -
Article 1
-3rd quarter appreciation down slightly: “Flint” leads Michigan
Article 2
- Business/Housing News Notes
Article 3 - 2002 Elections’ Anecdotes
Article 4 - Taxation and Finance - Planning 2002 Educational
Expenses
Article 5 - Sewer and Water Update
Association News Update From Laura
Economic Update - Confusion adds
to confidence woes
BS: Still about Nothing in
particular
Housing Industry Update
Would you like to see a previous Veritas Issues? Click Here
3rd
quarter appreciation down slightly: “Flint” leads Michigan
  
   This morning’s release of the 3rd quarter House Price Index of
the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO) had contained some
rather interesting data regarding actual appreciation of homes across the
country, and particularly in the “East North Central” region, which includes
Michigan and 4 neighboring states.
   For the nation as a whole, the HPI was up 6.16% in comparison to last year’s
same period, which was well below 2nd quarter growth of 6.48%. However, a
number of states, including Michigan, Illinois and Wisconsin actually showed
reductions in values for the quarter.
   As we’ve frequently noted, the HPI is based on transactions involving the
same properties, as tracked by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac over the past 22
years. Since it measures the value of the “same” homes over and over, it’s
not as subject to the market distortions that affect other price indexes,
like median and average prices.
   For example, two weeks ago the Realtors announced their Metro area price report,
noting the median price in metropolitan areas was up 7.2% during the previous
12 months. However, median prices have been particularly high due to the impact
of low mortgage rates as home buyers purchase more expensive homes, often
with lower monthly payments than a less expensive home months ago.
If we look at some of the areas where homes gained the most, we can easily see the discrepancies. The realtors reported the median price in the Monmouth - Ocean region of New Jersey was up 26%. But actual OFHEO number was 13.1%, or barely half.
Michigan gains just 3.63%
   Michigan homes appreciated at a mild 3.63% over the past 4 quarters, well
below the U.S. average, ranking 30th of the fifty states. But more notable
is that the state was one of 7 states where homes actually lost value during
the July through September period of this year.
   The strongest rate of appreciation in the state was right here in the Metro-Flint
area. In comparison to last year's 3rd quarter, Flint area homes were up 4.55%,
while only Ann Arbor (at 4.39%) was reasonably close. And during the third
quarter, "Flint" homes were up 0.61%, followed by Kalamazoo (0.34%)
and Detroit (0.14%). The rest of the state's metro areas were flat or, as
in Lansing and Saginaw, actually down.
   What's also notable is, after leading the nation in appreciation during the
final half of the '90s, not one Michigan community has a 5 year average that's
above the national average. In fact, for 5 year appreciation, the state's
dropped from fourth at the end of the century, to 17th just seven quarters
later.
   During the past 5 years, New Hampshire, Massachusetts & California, along with the District of Columbia, have all experienced 65 to 75% growth in their House Price Index level. Michigan's dropped from 45 to 35% over the past to years.
   Once again, the Bush administration angered
environmentalists, this time with a proposal to restore some semblance of
sanity to U.S. Forest policy. The administration wants to allow more flexibility,
and reduce obstacles, when considering approval of such activities as mining,
logging and recreation in national forests, while “more effectively involving
the public” in decision making according to the Forest Service. But environmentalists
see it as a “blatant” attempt to boost logging and aid the timber industry.
   What’s at issue is the part of the plan that would allow forest managers the
flexibility to “tailor analyses to the specific characteristics of their
forests and grasslands.” In other words, the need for public input would come
from those affected by the specific forest, not the general public (which
we’re sure is the environmentalists’ concern). If we recall last summer, when
fires were raging throughout the west, there were a large number of local
officials claiming national forest policy that restricts logging was responsible
for the severity of the fires. So, any modification of such policy that relies
on local input immediately becomes a threat to environmentalists’ goals.
Mold: Property owners recently gained advantage over
insurance companies in Federal Court when a judge ruled that the Property
Insurance policy for a shopping center “covers damage caused by mold.” According
to a Wall Street Journal article, the insurer contended that the policy
didn’t cover mold damage because it (the damage) was not “fortuitous” or “caused
by sudden discrete events.”
   The judge, on the other hand, defined the term “fortuitous” as “loss that
could not reasonably be foreseen.” There’s a belief the ruling will have a
critical impact on insurers claiming they cover only immediate catastrophic
loss. But it will also cause more companies to specifically cut mold from
coverage.
U.S. Home Sales Still Hot on October
  By most accounts, it’s been a pretty dismal
fall. With cold weather setting in early, auto sales plummeting in October,
consumer confidence showing no sign of recovery, there’s not been much to
cheer about (at least outside of Columbus OH). But despite all the negatives,
one sector of the U.S. economy continues to stay on fire. And, that sector
helped inspire skeptical markets again last week.
   Last Monday the National Association of Realtors reported existing homes sold
at a rate of 5.77 million units in October, up 6.1% from September’s rate
of 5.44 million. The October rate was highest since April. October’s data
suggest homes have sold at a rate of 5.584 million for the first ten months
of the year. To put it in perspective, the annual rate is 5.46% above last
year’s record of 5.295 million units.
   The following day the Department of Commerce said that new single family homes
sold at a rate of 1.01 million units, down slightly from the all time record
high of 1.05 million in September (the 3rd consecutive month of a million
plus sales rate). The “Commerce” data suggests homes have been selling at
an average rate of 964 thousand through the year’s first ten months, nearly
6.2% above the 908,000 unit record set in 2001. And, as with existing homes,
all but assure a record '02.
   As you are probably aware, Congress has provided taxpayers with
multiple tax incentives to help offset the increasing costs of higher education
such as Coverdell Education Savings Accounts, the Hope Scholarship Credit,
the Lifetime Learning Credit, education savings bonds, a limited student loan
interest deduction, and the new above-the-line deduction for qualified educational
expenses.
   While the various education tax incentives offer numerous ways to achieve
tax savings, limitations exist that affect the amount of education expenses
allowed as a deduction or credit for a given tax year, including income phase
outs, effective dates, the number of students, and their enrollment status.
Depending on your current situation as well as your plans for future educational
expenses, it may be advantageous to accelerate some of your planned educational
expenses into 2002 or defer these expenses to future years in order to maximize
the tax benefits offered by these incentives.
   Please contact your tax professional to discuss the education tax incentives
available to you and developing a plan to help you achieve the maximum tax
benefits from these incentives for 2002 as well as future years.
R, P & T
   Last Monday (11/25) Circuit Court Judge Geoffrey Neithercut ruled
to certify the Tobin/Gateway suit as a class action, noting that the future
of the Capital Improvement Fees were in jeopardy even if the “class action”
were not certified. However, this was still a blow to the industry since a
ruling against certification would have allowed the Drain Commissioner to
relax the moratorium, at least temporarily, to allow for approved plans to
be authorized “S” permits. (There are currently around 30 plans in the late
stages of the approval process, representing roughly 1,550 residential sites).
   Now the case moves on. The next important date is December 17th, when the
parties will meet in front of Judge Neithercut in a “settlement conference.”
   Three days prior to the ruling, County Drain Commissioner Jeff Wright met
with BAMF members to discuss the growing urgency of the situation, and the
potential options if the lawsuit continues to hold up future development.
Wright reiterated the problem that brought us to the need for the Capital
Improvement fee (CIF) in the first place; that the region’s out of sewer capacity,
and that the new projects (Western Trunk and Northeast relief sewers) were
needed to allow for future use. Without the guarantee of the CIFs, he can’t
sell bonds to build the additional capacity. So, there has to be another source
(at least to tie the project over until the lawsuit is settled), and he vowed
to look at other options.
   One temporary solution would be to go ahead with the Western Trunk line, which
is the least expensive of the projects, and would allow for roughly 50 thousand
additional units of capacity. The problem would be getting the county to back
the bonds for the project, while funds to pay for it remain in jeopardy. However,
as we wrote in the September 24th issue, in court earlier that week the plaintiffs
made it clear that they were no longer challenging the validity of the fees,
but the way in which their amounts were derived.
   We would think this would have an impact on the County board's decision if
and when the need to move in this direction presents itself.
Beyond Seinfeld: It’s still about "Nothing"
in particular
Would Jesus Drive “Environmentally Sensitive?”
  A few months back we wrote about the emergence of a coalition of
environmental and religious organizations across the nation. Well, last week
we discovered a new campaign to increase demand for cleaner, fuel efficient
cars, based on “What would Jesus drive?”
   The campaign, a joint effort of the “National Council of Churches” and “Coalition
on the Environment and Jewish Life” will begin television advertising in four
states (Iowa, MO., Indiana, NC) to promote the cause. And it’s mailing to
100,000 churches and synagogues to “discuss the relationship between fuel
economy and religious teachings.”
   Now, if this campaign’s successful, what can we expect to follow? Well, there’s
the obvious anti-sprawl campaign asking, “Where would Jesus live?” He’d definitely
want to be near the huddled masses, not in the far out suburbs!
   But we see this religious inspired campaign as opening up new opportunities
for Madison avenue, as using Jesus to promote is no longer verboten. So don’t
be surprised if he shows up hyping Lite beer because it’s less filling, feeding
the masses with “Charlie the Tuna,” or turning water into Earnest and Julio
Gallo’s wine.
   Of course, since Jesus was a carpenter, the BIG winner will depend on whether
Home Depot or Lowes wins the battle for endorsement rights, which may be the
biggest “war” since Nike v Titleist over Tiger Woods.
   But whichever wins, it should clearly answer the question, what would Jesus
drive? The answer would obviously be a Chevy Monte Carlo (yes, with the Home
Depot Winston Cup champs switch to Chevy in ‘03, both companies’ now have
ties to the same model)!
Ronald McDonald: The new “Joe Camel?”
   More than a year ago we joked about coming lawsuits against “fast food”
companies based on similar grounds to the suits against big tobacco. Last
week a highly publicized “class action” was filed in New York Federal court
against McDonald’s, claiming “Big Macs” and “Fries” were making kids obese.
With no warning labels on the “Happy Meal” and a barrage of promotions targeting
kids, conventional wisdom would suggest  that burger and fries’ dealers
are far more vulnerable than cigarette manufacturers. But, what about those
entertainment companies who join with McDonalds et al, to jointly promote
movies and fast food? Will Disney, LucasFilm and Sony be enjoined as co-defendants?
   But what about States’ Attorney Generals? Talk about another source for funds
to alleviate budget deficits. Figure it’s only a matter of time until we have
to decide if “fat funds” should go to financing health or education programs.
  
  
|
The annual Exhibitors’ Night, that has become one of the most highly attended association events, is scheduled for Wednesday, February 26, also at Bonapartes’. We’ll be sending out table reservation forms to previous exhibitors later this month ... if you’re not a previous exhibitor and wish to participate in this event, call the BAMF office for further information. Unless the holiday mail’s moving through the system without delay, the BAMF Holiday Open House probably has passed. However, we want to take this opportunity to initially thank Hill Steel and Building Supply, along with Michigan Construction Industry Mutual, for their sponsorship of this new annual event ... NAHB Convention Reminder! The final DEADLINE for advanced registration for the January 21 thru 24 event in Las Vegas is Friday, December 13th. If you plan on attending and want to avoid the lines at the convention, make sure you register by that date! |
|
|
Economic Update: Confusion
adds to confidence woes
  
   For the past six months it’s been more than evident that Americans
have little confidence in the economy. But, with the continuously conflicting
reports on economic activity, one has to wonder if the real problem isn’t
lack of confidence, but confusion. Perhaps the real question is, does anyone
have a solid take on the current state of the economy?
   Just look at the Wall Street Journal’s “Economy” page headlines. On
the day before Thanksgiving it read, “Economy Shows Surprising Strength.”
The Friday after the holiday it read, “Fed Officials Retain Gloomy View.”
The first article noted that Gross Domestic Product was revised upward, home
sales remained exceptionally strong and consumer confidence rose for the first
time since April (though it remained below even last fall’s post 9/11 levels).
   The second referred to the Federal Reserve’s “beige book” release, its survey
of business conditions of the Fed’s 12 districts. The survey found manufacturing
was “soft,” business capital spending was “limited” and, although retail spending
was up in half the districts, the increases were “generally slight.” However,
a secondary section of the article noted that orders for capital goods and
durable goods were up in October, as were personal income and spending. But
the “beige book” report commanded the headline.
   In reality, throughout the month of November, most economic reports indicated
renewed strength. Homes continued to sell at record levels. The stock market
continued an 8 week roll, and was still running strong this morning. Even
filing for unemployment benefits fell dramatically at the end of the month.
And, retail sales for the Thanksgiving weekend appear to have set a new record.
However, there was no evidence of a manufacturing recovery, which is what’s
really needed to assure the economy’s coming out of a weakened period.
3rd Quarter Growth
   Perhaps the best news was the Commerce Department’s upward revision of 3rd
quarter growth. The economy grew at a 4% rate for the period, up from 3.1
percent from the initial estimate. The big difference between the third and
2nd quarter (when GDP was up an anemic 1.3%) was consumer spending, which
rose 4.1 percent, led by incredible auto sales. Also, business investment
was stronger than initially estimated.
   So, as is evident in the graph, the economy has experienced
reasonably solid growth, averaging 3.25% for each quarter since it began its
recovery process on the heels of September 11's tragedies.
Housing Industry Update - U.S. Home Sales Still Hot in October
   Michigan’s permit authorizations soared to their 2nd highest
October level in recent history this year, rising 19.7% from the September
level according to a report issued last Wednesday by the Federal government.
According to Census Bureau data, 5001 housing units were authorized by permit
during the month, of which 4,109 were single family. Both numbers were the
second strongest in recent history, being topped only in ‘98 when Michigan’s
housing activity peaked at more than 54,400 units.
   Normally October accounts for just under 9% of the state’s annual units. So,
the annualized rate of the month’s activity would be 55,755, the highest for
the year.
   As we noted in the most recent issue, permit activity for the first three
quarters of the year has steadily declined during the past four years. However,
October’s data suggests that the Metro-Detroit area (including Flint & Ann
Arbor) and the Grand Rapids area are running above 2001 levels. And, as we’ve
previously reported, those are the only areas where federal data is remotely
accurate, prior to it’s final revisions (in spring of the following year).
So, it becomes a distinct possibility that 2002 will reverse the state’s four
year downward trend.
   And, regarding Commerce Department data on the metropolitan areas
referred to, we can see that single family activity is nearly a thousand units
higher (4.5%) year to date than at this time last year. And, even the Flint
area, which is off by more than 7%, is down just 128 units from the same period
last year, when it led the state in growth.
   In total housing units, the combined areas have authorized an estimated 27,630
permits so far this year, up 2.4% (647 units) from last year. Flint, at 2,142
units, is nearly 600 (22%) behind its ‘01 level. However, it’s important to
recall that the area had a surge in apartment building for the first time
in decades last year.